When Apple began pushing the photo capabilities of the iPhone many years ago, it jumpstarted a movement that pretty soon became one of the most important aspects of smartphones. Now, if a smartphone doesn’t have a good camera, then it’s not worth buying.

The iPhone XR continues to establish Apple’s dominance in the mobile photography segment. Instead of copying what it did with the iPhone XS and its dual-camera, it did something different by just going the single 12MP wide lens with f/1.8. This forced the company to include an even wider lens than what the XS offers.

Huawei’s approach with the Mate 20 Pro is much different. Instead of going with less, it went with much more. It packs a triple-camera system consisting of a main 40MP shooter with f/1.8, a 20MP ultra-wide shooter with f/2.2 and an 8MP telephoto lens with f/2.4 with 5x optical zoom.

Let’s see how the iPhone XR and Mate 20 Pro cameras compare.

The first thing you’ll notice right away is that the iPhone XR pictures are much warmer than the Mate 20 Pro. At first glance, the iPhone pictures are almost too warm, but as you look closer, you’ll notice the color comes out looking more natural. It’s as if the Mate 20 Pro overexposes the color to capture the most dynamic range from bright colors, but it doesn’t quite produce the results it aims for.

It’s most evident with the bright colors from the poinsettia and the red sweater.

Though the Mate 20 Pro does produce very sharp images, they’re almost too sharp to the point where they look a bit unnatural. The iPhone XR does a better job of delivering more realistic photos, especially in detail (Robert’s beard) and skin tone.

Where the Mate 20 does one-up the iPhone XR rather easily is in low-light photos. Through its Night Mode, it’s able to brighten up the dark areas that are completely devoid of detail whereas the iPhone XR doesn’t do anything with these areas to avoid unwanted noise. The Mate 20 Pro is not as impressive as the Pixel’s Night Sight, but it doesn’t fall too far behind.

I preferred the iPhone XR’s selfie camera as well combined with the portrait mode effect. It still struggles to cut out the subject properly, but it still takes the more natural photo as opposed to the Mate 20 Pro, which does a bad job at blurring the background. You can adjust the effect afterwards, but it still didn’t quite meet expectations.

Check out the camera comparison between the iPhone XR and Mate 20 Pro in the gallery above and decide which one you prefer.

In 2018, the title of best mobile camera belongs to the Pixel 3. Google unveiled the device at an October event and though a lot of the initial talk was centered around its polarizing notch, all the attention is now focused on the fantastic camera.

It consists of only one 12MP shooter in a sea of dual and triple camera systems. And to be honest, it’s not missing out on much. Google makes up for the missing hardware with the best camera software around. From Night Sight to HDR+, the Pixel 3 XL proves Google is at the top of its game.

Huawei’s Mate 20 Pro is trying to prove otherwise with raw hardware. It has three cameras: a main 40MP shooter, a 20MP ultra-wide shooter and an 8MP telephoto shooter. That delivers the most versatility any smartphone camera can offer.

Not to be outdone by the Pixel 3 XL’s impressive camera software capabilities, the Mate 20 Pro has some tricks up its sleeve with Night Mode and Master AI processing.

Let’s see how the Pixel 3 XL and Mate 20 Pro cameras compare.

The pictures the Pixel 3 XL produces come out looking very dynamic and detailed. Colors are more saturated, which contrasts nicely with the balanced colors around it. The HDR+ also does a great job of capturing the crisp details of a setting.

With Night Sight, Google does some impressive wizardry to bring out details in even the darkest of scenes. In sunset shots, the colors of the sky retain a striking level of colors. Where other smartphones completely fall apart, the Pixel 3 XL can make something out of nothing, producing faithful subjects.

Much of this impressive performance is carried over to the front-facing camera system, which benefits greatly from a wide-angle lens that captures much more of a scene.

The Mate 20 Pro camera produces impressive images that stand their ground with the Pixel 3 XL—for the most part. In well lit conditions, it delivers pictures that slightly differ on dynamic range and color reproduction that is less saturated.

One unexpected difference between the two cameras is how much wider the Mate 20 Pro main shooter is over the Pixel 3 XL. The main effect is that pictures capture more of the scene, and it’s something I suspect many will enjoy.

Where the Mate 20 Pro struggles to match performance is in low-light, even with Night Mode. It performs better than just about every other camera, except the Pixel 3 XL. In sunset pictures the colors look a little muted while in night shots the detail captured isn’t as vivid.

In selfie mode, as well as other pictures of humans, the Mate 20 Pro offers a slightly brighter take on skin. It’s not as natural as on the Pixel 3 XL, which handles tones much better.

Check out the camera comparison between the Pixel 3 XL and Mate 20 Pro in the gallery above and decide which one you prefer.

Google last week officially unveiled the Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL, showcasing the refined design, including the addition of wireless charging. The highlight of the show, however, was the Pixel 3’s camera, which Google improved upon yet again with several new features. To see if the Pixel retains its throne as the best smartphone camera on the market, we put it against Apple’s new iPhone XS.

Google’s whole conceit with the Pixel has been software; it’s been that way from the beginning. Rather than get caught up in megapixels and multiple cameras, the company used its legendary machine learning to create images that were sharper, more true-to-life, and better than anything else on the market. Then, with the Pixel 2, it introduced the Visual Core to handle complex imaging for even better results.

With the Pixel 3, Google again focused almost entirely on software. The device still has a 12.2MP with f/1.8 and dual-pixel phase detection autofocus, as well as optical and electronic image stabilization. But that’s secondary to the many new software tricks, including Top Shot, Photobooth Mode, Group Selfie, and more.

Google’s prized feature is HDR+, which can capture up to 8 frames and merge them together for the best possible photo, ensuring shadows are bright and highlights aren’t blown out. This is the feature that has helped the Pixel excel as the market’s most impressive smartphone camera.

Apple’s iPhone XS does similar software tricky. With a new Smart HDR mode, Apple’s new flagship also combines multiple photos into one, bringing more highlight and shadow detail into images. In our review of the iPhone XS, we saw the device’s camera software produce terrific pictures.

Like Google, Apple this year primarily focused on software over hardware, integrating the iPhone XS’ ISP, Neural Engine, and advanced algorithms. The results really do speak for themselves and are a huge step up from the iPhone X, which already featured a great camera.

The big advantage the iPhone XS holds over the Pixel 3 is the device’s telephoto lens. It’s something people often fail to mention when comparing the iPhone and the Pixel. Having a second telephoto lens makes the iPhone XS a more flexible shooter and works fantastically well when taking portrait photos.

Google did address that in the Pixel 3 with a new feature called Super Res Zoom, but it’s not quite as powerful. Digital zoom isn’t nearly as good as optical zoom, no matter how amazing Google’s algorithms are.

In the sample photos we took, it’s clear that both handsets are capable of taking incredible images, and each has their own quirks. The iPhone still produces warmer images, which I tend to like. The Pixel, meanwhile, make pictures that look instantly ready for social media, no editing required.

We also noticed that the Pixel 3 images are sharper than the iPhone XS—but sometimes Google’s device can overdo it. In portrait mode, the two perform about the same. It’s clear that these images are heavily influenced by software, but they’re convincing enough. While the iPhone produces a more pleasing depth of field, the Pixel’s images do a nice job of replicating skin tones that are more true-to-life.

One area where the Pixel is a clear winner over the iPhone is the front-facing camera. The Pixel 3’s new Group Selfie mode allows users to capture more scenery in the frame. In the image we used to take a group selfie, you can see how much more we were able to get in the frame when using the Pixel 3. If you don’t want a wider field of view, you can always use the Pixel 3’s standard front-facing camera.

For a more thorough breakdown of how each camera works, you can see Robert’s breakdown in the video above. He’ll explain each shot and how each phone performed in a particular scenario.

What’s clear is that the Pixel 3 and iPhone XS are pretty much dead even in a lot of scenarios. Apple was able to gain a lot of ground with its new Smart HDR feature, but Google’s Pixel 3 still takes images that are sharper and more pleasing right out of the phone, whereas the iPhone XS images can do with a little editing.

Check out the full gallery up above.